Skip to content

Sune Bjørn Andersen

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Networthify  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sune Bjørn Andersen commented  · 

    It is a very important piece of information but the calculation is correct. You can retire earlier withdrawing 5% instead of 4%. This however increases risk that isn't part of the calculation. It shouldn't be part of the calculation but it is very important background knowledge of the calculation.

  2. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networthify  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sune Bjørn Andersen commented  · 

    Maybe you could do this by changing the roi number. Say your target is 100k a year to live on. Tax wise this means that half will be taxed at rought 25% and the other half at roughly 50%. if the roi after inflation (7-2) is 5, then the math would be (5*0.75+5*0.5)/2 = 3.125 (this roi would include the premise that half is taxed 25% and half 50%). Also check out my site about FIRE in Denmark: www.frinans.dk

    Sune Bjørn Andersen supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base